H.J.Res. 104 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision a

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-07-10 · Sponsored by Rep. Downing, Troy [R-MT-2] (R-MT) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-12-11): Became Public Law No: 119-48.

Summary

Reopens 1.7 million acres in southeastern Montana to coal leasing by overturning a BLM land management plan that had made zero acres available for new coal development. The Biden-era plan effectively shut down future coal leasing in the Miles City Field Office area, and this resolution reverses that decision.

The Good

+

Restores coal leasing access in Montana

The overturned BLM rule had made zero acres available for coal leasing in the Miles City Field Office area and removed 1.7 million acres from consideration. Reversing this keeps energy production options open in a region where coal mining supports local economies.

+

Preserves existing mining jobs and community revenue

Coal mining operations in southeastern Montana provide direct employment and generate royalty payments that fund local schools and infrastructure. The BLM plan would have phased out these economic foundations without an immediate replacement industry.

The Bad

-

Reverses environmental protections for 1.7 million acres

The BLM plan removed these lands from coal leasing consideration after environmental review found significant impacts to air quality, water resources, and wildlife habitat. Overturning the rule reopens these areas without requiring a new environmental assessment.

-

Locks in fossil fuel development at the expense of climate goals

New coal leases commit public lands to decades of carbon-intensive extraction. Under the Congressional Review Act, the agency cannot issue a substantially similar rule in the future, permanently limiting BLM's ability to manage these lands for climate considerations.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-10-08

Passage (Senate)

52 Yea47 Nay0 NV
Republicans
52Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
0Y / 45N
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #549

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-10-07

Motion to Proceed

50 Yea47 Nay0 NV
Republicans
50Y / 0N / 3NV
Democrats
0Y / 45N
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #548

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

House, 2025-09-03

Passage (House)

211 Yea208 Nay0 NV
Republicans
211Y / 1N / 7NV
Democrats
0Y / 207N / 5NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #224

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.