H.J.Res. 105 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-07-10 · Sponsored by Rep. Fedorchak, Julie [R-ND-At Large] (R-ND) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-12-11): Became Public Law No: 119-49.

Summary

Throws out a BLM land management plan that restricted oil, gas, and coal development on federal land in North Dakota. The plan limited drilling in areas deemed low-potential and only allowed new coal leasing within four miles of existing mines. This resolution scraps those restrictions and reverts to the previous, more permissive 1988 plan.

The Good

+

Reopens North Dakota lands for oil and gas development

The overturned BLM rule restricted oil and gas development in areas deemed low-potential and limited new coal leasing to within four miles of existing mines. Reversing this gives energy companies broader access to federal lands in the state.

+

Supports North Dakota's energy-dependent economy

Oil and gas extraction is central to North Dakota's economy. The BLM restrictions would have limited future development in areas that may prove productive as extraction technology improves, potentially costing the state tax revenue and jobs.

The Bad

-

Removes protections developed through multi-year public review

BLM's resource management plan went through years of public comment, environmental review, and stakeholder consultation. The CRA resolution overturns all of that work with a simple majority vote and no requirement to consider the underlying analysis.

-

Prevents BLM from issuing similar protections in the future

Under the Congressional Review Act, once a rule is disapproved, the agency cannot reissue a rule in substantially the same form without new legislation. This permanently constrains BLM's ability to balance development with conservation in the region.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-10-08

Passage (Senate)

50 Yea45 Nay0 NV
Republicans
50Y / 0N / 3NV
Democrats
0Y / 43N / 2NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #556

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

House, 2025-09-03

Passage (House)

215 Yea211 Nay0 NV
Republicans
215Y / 1N / 3NV
Democrats
0Y / 210N / 2NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #226

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.