H.J.Res. 106 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approve

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-07-14 · Sponsored by Rep. Begich, Nicholas J. [R-AK-At Large] (R-AK) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-12-11): Became Public Law No: 119-50.

Summary

Strips environmental protections from roughly 3.6 million acres of Alaska’s interior by overturning a BLM plan that had designated 21 areas as critical environmental concern zones in the Central Yukon region. Removing the designations opens the land back up to potential mining and energy development.

The Good

+

Opens 3.6 million acres in Alaska for potential development

The overturned BLM rule had designated 21 areas of critical environmental concern totaling approximately 3.6 million acres. Reversing this removes development restrictions on a vast stretch of Alaska's interior, potentially unlocking mineral and energy resources.

+

Supports Alaska Native communities dependent on resource development

Some Alaska Native corporations and communities rely on resource extraction revenues. The environmental designations restricted activities on lands where these communities have economic interests, and removal of the designations restores those opportunities.

The Bad

-

Eliminates protections for critical wildlife habitat

The 21 designated areas included habitat for caribou, migratory birds, and other species. These areas of critical environmental concern were identified through scientific review as requiring special management attention. The CRA resolution removes all 21 designations simultaneously.

-

Affects lands with cultural and subsistence significance

While some Alaska communities support development, others depend on these lands for subsistence hunting and fishing. The environmental designations balanced these competing interests after extensive consultation. The CRA resolution removes these protections without a substitute plan.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-10-09

Passage (Senate)

50 Yea46 Nay0 NV
Republicans
50Y / 0N / 3NV
Democrats
0Y / 44N / 1NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #560

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

House, 2025-09-03

Passage (House)

215 Yea210 Nay0 NV
Republicans
215Y / 1N / 3NV
Democrats
0Y / 209N / 3NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #225

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.