H.J.Res. 20 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-01-15 · Sponsored by Rep. Palmer, Gary J. [R-AL-6] (R-AL) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-05-09): Became Public Law No: 119-6.

Summary

Overturns a Biden-era DOE rule that set stricter efficiency standards for tankless gas water heaters. The rule would have required new models to hit higher energy efficiency targets, which supporters said would save consumers money long-term but critics argued would raise upfront costs and limit available options.

The Good

+

Preserves consumer choice in water heater selection

The DOE rule would have required new gas-fired instantaneous water heaters to meet higher efficiency standards, potentially limiting available models and increasing upfront costs. Consumers can still choose higher-efficiency models voluntarily.

+

Avoids forcing expensive upgrades on lower-income households

Higher-efficiency appliances typically cost more upfront. For households that cannot afford the initial premium, mandating higher standards effectively prices them out of new appliance purchases or forces them into financing arrangements.

The Bad

-

Blocks standards that would save consumers money over time

DOE calculated the efficiency standards would save consumers money over the lifetime of the appliance through lower energy bills, even accounting for higher purchase prices. The department estimated net savings of hundreds of dollars per unit over its service life.

-

Increases household energy consumption and emissions

Less efficient water heaters use more natural gas, increasing both consumer energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions. Water heating is one of the largest energy uses in residential buildings, making efficiency standards in this category particularly impactful.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-04-10

Passage (Senate)

53 Yea44 Nay0 NV
Republicans
51Y / 0N / 2NV
Democrats
2Y / 43N
Independents
0Y / 1N / 1NV

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #207

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-04-09

Motion to Proceed

52 Yea42 Nay0 NV
Republicans
50Y / 0N / 3NV
Democrats
2Y / 41N / 2NV
Independents
0Y / 1N / 1NV

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #206

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.