H.J.Res. 24 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-01-16 · Sponsored by Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5] (R-OK) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-05-09): Became Public Law No: 119-7.

Summary

Kills a DOE rule that would have raised energy efficiency requirements for commercial walk-in coolers and freezers. Restaurants, grocery stores, and other food businesses would have eventually needed to buy pricier, more efficient units. Congress used the CRA to block the rule before it took effect.

The Good

+

Reduces compliance costs for restaurants and grocery stores

Walk-in coolers and freezers are essential equipment for food service and retail. The new standards would have required upgrading to more efficient but costlier models, a burden that falls hardest on small businesses operating on thin margins.

+

Avoids supply chain disruption during transition

Manufacturers would need retooling time to meet new standards. During the transition, businesses needing replacements could face limited availability or inflated prices for compliant models.

The Bad

-

Blocks energy savings for commercial operators

Commercial refrigeration is one of the largest electricity consumers in retail and food service. DOE estimated the standards would save businesses significant money on electricity bills over the equipment lifetime, more than offsetting higher purchase costs.

-

Keeps commercial electricity demand higher than necessary

Walk-in coolers and freezers run continuously. Inefficient models waste electricity around the clock. Over millions of commercial units nationwide, the foregone efficiency gains add up to substantial excess electricity generation and associated emissions.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-04-03

Passage (Senate)

53 Yea42 Nay0 NV
Republicans
53Y / 0N
Democrats
0Y / 40N / 5NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #162

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-04-02

Motion to Proceed

51 Yea46 Nay0 NV
Republicans
51Y / 0N / 2NV
Democrats
0Y / 44N / 1NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #161

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

House, 2025-03-27

Passage (House)

203 Yea182 Nay0 NV
Republicans
197Y / 0N / 20NV
Democrats
6Y / 182N / 25NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #77

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.