H.J.Res. 42 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program for Appliance Standar

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-02-12 · Sponsored by Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9] (R-GA) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-05-09): Became Public Law No: 119-8.

Summary

Reverses a DOE rule that updated certification, labeling, and enforcement requirements for a wide range of appliances and commercial equipment, from washing machines and dishwashers to computer room air conditioners. Manufacturers argued the new paperwork and testing requirements added cost without real consumer benefit.

The Good

+

Reduces paperwork burden on manufacturers

The DOE rule revised certification requirements, labeling rules, and enforcement provisions for a broad range of consumer products and commercial equipment. Manufacturers argued the updated requirements added administrative costs without corresponding consumer benefit.

+

Prevents regulatory overreach into product labeling

The rule covered products ranging from washing machines and dishwashers to commercial air conditioners. Critics argued DOE was expanding its regulatory footprint beyond efficiency standards into areas better handled by industry self-regulation and market competition.

The Bad

-

Weakens consumer access to energy efficiency information

Certification and labeling requirements help consumers compare the energy costs of appliances before purchase. Rolling back these requirements makes it harder for buyers to make informed decisions about which products will save them money on utility bills.

-

Reduces enforcement ability for existing standards

The rule updated not just labeling but also enforcement provisions. Without updated enforcement tools, DOE has less ability to ensure manufacturers actually meet the efficiency standards already on the books, potentially allowing non-compliant products into the market.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-04-30

Passage (Senate)

52 Yea46 Nay0 NV
Republicans
52Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
0Y / 44N / 1NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #223

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-04-29

Motion to Proceed

52 Yea46 Nay0 NV
Republicans
52Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
0Y / 44N / 1NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #222

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

House, 2025-03-05

Passage (House)

222 Yea203 Nay0 NV
Republicans
215Y / 0N / 3NV
Democrats
7Y / 203N / 4NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #59

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.