H.J.Res. 60 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to "Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehi

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-02-21 · Sponsored by Rep. Maloy, Celeste [R-UT-2] (R-UT) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-05-23): Became Public Law No: 119-13.

Summary

Reopens Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in Utah and Arizona to off-road vehicles by overturning a National Park Service rule that had restricted ATV and off-highway vehicle use in parts of the park. Supporters said the restrictions hurt local tourism; opponents said the rule protected fragile desert landscapes.

The Good

+

Preserves recreational vehicle access in Glen Canyon

The National Park Service rule restricted off-highway and all-terrain vehicle use in parts of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. Overturning it maintains access for recreational users who depend on these lands for ATV riding, a significant draw for tourism in the region.

+

Supports local tourism economy

Off-road recreation generates economic activity in rural Utah and Arizona communities near Glen Canyon. Restricting vehicle access would reduce visitor spending at local businesses that cater to motorized recreation.

The Bad

-

Increases erosion and damage to fragile desert landscapes

Off-road vehicles cause soil compaction, erosion, and destruction of biological soil crusts that take decades to recover in desert environments. The NPS developed the restrictions based on documented resource damage in high-use areas of the recreation area.

-

Creates conflicts between motorized and non-motorized recreation

Hikers, campers, and boaters also use Glen Canyon. Unrestricted off-road vehicle use creates noise pollution, dust, and safety hazards that diminish the experience for non-motorized visitors and can damage cultural resources.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-05-08

Passage (Senate)

50 Yea43 Nay0 NV
Republicans
50Y / 0N / 3NV
Democrats
0Y / 41N / 4NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #239

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-05-06

Motion to Proceed

53 Yea47 Nay0 NV
Republicans
53Y / 0N
Democrats
0Y / 45N
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #236

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

House, 2025-04-29

Passage (House)

219 Yea205 Nay0 NV
Republicans
217Y / 0N / 3NV
Democrats
2Y / 205N / 6NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #110

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.