H.J.Res. 61 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazard

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-02-25 · Sponsored by Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9] (R-VA) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-05-23): Became Public Law No: 119-14.

Summary

Wipes out new EPA emission standards for rubber tire factories that were supposed to limit hazardous air pollutants released during the manufacturing process. The EPA wrote the rule after a federal court told it to close a gap in its regulation of the industry. Congress used the CRA to undo the standards before they took effect.

The Good

+

Removes additional compliance burden on tire manufacturers

The EPA rule imposed new hazardous air pollutant emission standards on the rubber tire manufacturing industry. Overturning it avoids costs of installing and maintaining additional pollution control equipment that manufacturers argued could affect competitiveness.

+

Industry argued standards were more stringent than necessary

Tire manufacturers contended the new emission limits went beyond what current technology could efficiently achieve, potentially forcing plant closures rather than upgrades. They argued existing regulations already adequately controlled emissions.

The Bad

-

Overturns standards for known carcinogenic and toxic air pollutants

Rubber tire manufacturing produces hazardous air pollutants including benzene and formaldehyde, both classified as human carcinogens. The EPA rule was developed in response to a court order finding existing standards inadequate to protect communities near these facilities.

-

Disproportionately affects communities near manufacturing plants

Tire manufacturing facilities are often located in lower-income and minority communities. Weakening emission standards means these communities continue bearing the health costs of industrial pollution without the protections the EPA determined were necessary.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-05-06

Passage (Senate)

55 Yea45 Nay0 NV
Republicans
53Y / 0N
Democrats
2Y / 43N
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #232

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-05-05

Motion to Proceed

51 Yea43 Nay0 NV
Republicans
49Y / 0N / 4NV
Democrats
2Y / 41N / 2NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #231

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

House, 2025-03-05

Passage (House)

216 Yea202 Nay0 NV
Republicans
209Y / 1N / 8NV
Democrats
7Y / 201N / 6NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #58

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.