H.J.Res. 75 · 119th Congress · House

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy relating to

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-03-10 · Sponsored by Rep. Goldman, Craig [R-TX-12] (R-TX) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-05-09): Became Public Law No: 119-9.

Summary

Undoes a DOE rule that tightened energy efficiency standards for commercial refrigerators, freezers, and combo units used by businesses. The rule aimed for maximum feasible efficiency improvements, but businesses argued it would force costly equipment upgrades and eliminate specialized models they depend on.

The Good

+

Avoids forcing costly equipment upgrades on businesses

The DOE rule would have imposed new energy conservation standards on commercial refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers. For businesses that recently purchased equipment, new standards can render existing stock non-compliant for replacement purposes, increasing costs.

+

Keeps equipment options available for specialized needs

Some commercial operations require specific refrigeration configurations for food safety or operational reasons. Tighter efficiency standards can eliminate models designed for specialized applications, forcing businesses into equipment that does not meet their operational needs.

The Bad

-

Foregoes billions in cumulative energy savings

DOE estimated the updated standards would save commercial operators billions of dollars in electricity costs over 30 years. Blocking these standards means businesses and the grid continue absorbing unnecessarily high energy consumption from commercial refrigeration.

-

Stalls progress on commercial building energy efficiency

Refrigeration accounts for a major share of electricity use in supermarkets and convenience stores. These standards were part of a broader effort to reduce energy intensity in commercial buildings, a key component of grid reliability and emissions reduction strategies.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-05-01

Passage (Senate)

52 Yea45 Nay0 NV
Republicans
52Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
0Y / 43N / 2NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #228

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-04-30

Motion to Proceed

52 Yea46 Nay0 NV
Republicans
52Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
0Y / 44N / 1NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #224

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

House, 2025-03-27

Passage (House)

214 Yea193 Nay0 NV
Republicans
209Y / 0N / 8NV
Democrats
5Y / 193N / 15NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #78

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.