S. 5 · 119th Congress · Senate

Laken Riley Act

Signed into LawImmigrationCriminal JusticeBipartisan

Introduced 2025-01-09 · Sponsored by Katie Britt (R-AL) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-01-29): Signed into law by the President.

Summary

Named after a nursing student killed by an undocumented immigrant, this law requires Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to detain undocumented immigrants charged with theft or violent crimes. It also allows state attorneys general to sue the federal government over immigration enforcement failures.

The Good

+

Closes a detention gap for charged individuals

Before this law, ICE had discretion on whether to detain undocumented immigrants charged with (but not convicted of) certain crimes. The mandatory detention requirement removes that discretion for theft and violent offenses.

+

Bipartisan support in the Senate

Passed the Senate 64-35, with 12 Democrats voting in favor. This level of bipartisan agreement is unusual for immigration legislation in recent Congresses.

+

Gives states legal standing to challenge federal enforcement

State attorneys general can now sue the federal government if they believe immigration enforcement failures caused harm within their state. This creates an accountability mechanism that didn't previously exist.

The Bad

-

Mandatory detention based on charges, not convictions

The law triggers detention upon being charged, not convicted. This raises due process concerns since charges can be dropped, reduced, or result in acquittal. The ACLU argues this effectively punishes people before trial.

-

Significant detention cost burden

ICE detention costs roughly $150 per person per day. Mandatory detention of a larger population without additional funding creates either budget strain or worse conditions. CBO estimated the cost impact at several hundred million annually.

-

Named legislation can prioritize emotion over policy

Laws named after crime victims tend to be crafted around a single incident rather than systemic analysis. Research from the Brennan Center shows that named criminal justice bills often produce broader consequences than the specific problem they reference.

Vote Record

House, 2025-01-22

Bipartisan

Passage (House)

263 Yea156 Nay0 NV
Republicans
217Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
46Y / 156N / 13NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #23

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-01-20

Bipartisan

Passage (Senate)

64 Yea35 Nay0 NV
Republicans
52Y / 0N
Democrats
12Y / 33N
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #7

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-01-17

Bipartisan

Cloture Motion

61 Yea35 Nay0 NV
Republicans
51Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
10Y / 33N / 2NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #5

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-01-13

Bipartisan

Motion to Proceed

82 Yea10 Nay0 NV
Republicans
49Y / 0N / 2NV
Democrats
32Y / 9N / 4NV
Independents
1Y / 1N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #2

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-01-09

Bipartisan

Cloture on Motion to Proceed

84 Yea9 Nay0 NV
Republicans
51Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
32Y / 8N / 5NV
Independents
1Y / 1N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #1

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Democrat majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.