S. 6 · 119th Congress · Senate

Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act

Passed SenateCriminal Justice

Introduced 2025-01-15 · Sponsored by Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK] (R-OK) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-01-22): Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 47. Record Vote Number: 11. (CR S294-295)

Summary

Requires doctors to provide the same standard of medical care to any infant born alive after an attempted abortion as they would to any other newborn at the same gestational age, and to immediately transfer the infant to a hospital. Creates criminal penalties for health care workers who fail to comply, and gives the mother a private right of action to sue if the law is violated.

The Good

+

Establishes explicit standard of care for infants born alive after abortion

Requires health care practitioners to exercise the same degree of professional skill and care for an infant born alive following an abortion attempt as would be offered to any other child born at the same gestational age. Creates a clear legal standard where one did not previously exist at the federal level.

+

Requires immediate hospital admission

Mandates that any infant born alive be immediately transported to a hospital for care. This ensures that born-alive infants receive institutional medical support rather than being treated solely at the facility where the abortion was performed.

+

Creates enforcement mechanism with criminal penalties

Establishes criminal penalties for health care practitioners who willfully fail to provide care to born-alive infants. Supporters argue that without enforcement teeth, the existing 2002 Born-Alive Infants Protection Act lacks practical effect.

The Bad

-

Born-alive infants are already protected by existing federal law

The 2002 Born-Alive Infants Protection Act already recognizes all born-alive infants as legal persons entitled to the same protections as any other person. Critics argue this bill is legally redundant and exists primarily as a political messaging tool rather than a response to an actual gap in the law.

-

The scenario it addresses is extremely rare

Medical professionals report that live births following abortion attempts are exceedingly uncommon, particularly given modern procedures. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has stated that the bill addresses a scenario that does not reflect clinical reality and could interfere with end-of-life care decisions for non-viable infants.

-

Criminal penalties could create a chilling effect on medical care

Threat of prosecution may deter physicians from providing late-term abortions even in medically necessary cases. Doctors treating patients with severe fetal anomalies or life-threatening complications could face legal risk for decisions made under emergency conditions.

Vote Record

Senate, 2025-01-22

Cloture on Motion to Proceed

52 Yea47 Nay0 NV
Republicans
52Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
0Y / 45N
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #11

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.