S.J.Res. 13 · 119th Congress · Senate

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the Department of t

Signed into LawEconomy

Introduced 2025-02-04 · Sponsored by Sen. Kennedy, John [R-LA] (R-LA) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-06-20): Became Public Law No: 119-19.

Summary

Rolls back tougher bank merger review standards that had eliminated automatic approvals and streamlined application forms. The original rule was meant to give regulators more time to scrutinize proposed mergers, but Congress overturned it, restoring the faster approval process that the banking industry preferred.

The Good

+

Streamlines bank merger approvals to reduce delays

The OCC rule had removed automatic approvals under expedited review and discontinued streamlined application forms. Overturning it restores faster processing for bank mergers, which the banking industry argued is essential for community banks seeking to consolidate and compete with larger institutions.

+

Supports community bank consolidation as a survival strategy

Small and mid-size banks face rising compliance costs and competitive pressure from megabanks and fintechs. Mergers are often the only viable path for these institutions to maintain services in their communities. Slower approvals can kill deals and leave rural areas without local banking options.

The Bad

-

Weakens scrutiny of bank consolidation that reduces competition

The OCC rule strengthened review of mergers that could reduce banking competition in local markets. Restoring expedited approvals means mergers that eliminate consumer choices may face less analysis before being rubber-stamped.

-

Bank mergers often lead to branch closures and job losses

Post-merger consolidation typically involves closing overlapping branches and reducing staff. Communities that lose their local bank branch face reduced access to financial services, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The OCC rule was designed to weigh these impacts more carefully.

Vote Record

House, 2025-05-20

220 Yea207 Nay0 NV
Republicans
219Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
1Y / 207N / 5NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #137

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-05-07

52 Yea47 Nay0 NV
Republicans
52Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
0Y / 45N
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #237

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-05-06

53 Yea46 Nay0 NV
Republicans
53Y / 0N
Democrats
0Y / 45N
Independents
0Y / 1N / 1NV

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #233

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.