S.J.Res. 28 · 119th Congress · Senate

A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applica

Signed into LawEconomy

Introduced 2025-02-27 · Sponsored by Sen. Ricketts, Pete [R-NE] (R-NE) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-05-09): Became Public Law No: 119-11.

Summary

Stops the CFPB from being able to directly supervise big payment apps like Venmo, Cash App, and similar platforms. The rule would have subjected any nonbank payment app processing 50+ million transactions a year to the same kind of oversight that banks get. Congress killed it, keeping these tech companies under lighter regulation.

The Good

+

Avoids treating payment apps like banks when they are not banks

The CFPB rule would have subjected large payment app companies (those processing 50+ million transactions annually) to the same supervisory authority applied to banks. These companies argued they are technology platforms, not financial institutions, and should not face banking-style examinations.

+

Prevents regulatory burden that could stifle fintech innovation

Subjecting payment apps to federal supervision adds compliance costs that could slow feature development, increase fees, or discourage new entrants into the market. The US fintech sector has grown partly because of lighter regulatory treatment compared to traditional banking.

The Bad

-

Leaves billions in consumer funds without federal oversight

Large payment apps like Venmo, Cash App, and PayPal hold and transfer billions of dollars for consumers. Without CFPB supervisory authority, these companies are not subject to the same routine examinations for consumer protection compliance that banks undergo.

-

Consumers have fewer protections on payment apps than at banks

When fraud or errors occur on payment apps, consumers often have less recourse than with traditional bank accounts. The CFPB rule was designed to ensure these platforms meet the same consumer protection standards as the banks they increasingly compete with and replace.

Vote Record

House, 2025-04-09

219 Yea211 Nay0 NV
Republicans
219Y / 0N / 1NV
Democrats
0Y / 211N / 2NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #95

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-03-05

51 Yea47 Nay0 NV
Republicans
51Y / 1N / 1NV
Democrats
0Y / 44N / 1NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #106

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-03-04

50 Yea47 Nay0 NV
Republicans
50Y / 1N / 2NV
Democrats
0Y / 44N / 1NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #103

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.