S.J.Res. 80 · 119th Congress · Senate

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "National Petroleum Reserv

Signed into LawEnvironment

Introduced 2025-09-18 · Sponsored by Sen. Sullivan, Dan [R-AK] (R-AK) · Last updated 2026-03-31

Last action (2025-12-05): Became Public Law No: 119-47.

Summary

Reverses a Biden-era decision that closed nearly half of Alaska’s 23-million-acre National Petroleum Reserve to oil and gas drilling. The 2022 BLM plan had locked up about 48% of the reserve to protect caribou habitat and Indigenous subsistence areas. This resolution reverts to a 2020 plan that opened the full reserve for energy development.

The Good

+

Reopens 48% of the National Petroleum Reserve for development

The 2022 BLM plan had closed roughly half of the 23-million-acre reserve to oil and gas leasing. Reverting to the 2020 plan restores access to these areas, which the reserve was originally designated to support domestic energy production.

+

The reserve was created specifically for petroleum development

The National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska was established by Congress in 1923 as an emergency oil supply. Supporters argue that restricting development in a reserve explicitly created for that purpose contradicts its foundational mandate.

The Bad

-

Removes protections for wildlife and subsistence communities

The closed areas included Teshekpuk Lake, the largest Arctic lake in North America and critical habitat for hundreds of thousands of migratory birds. Indigenous communities depend on caribou, fish, and birds from these lands for subsistence. The 2022 plan was designed to balance development with these needs.

-

Overturns protections developed through extensive public process

The 2022 Integrated Activity Plan involved years of environmental review, public comment, and tribal consultation. The CRA resolution discards this process with a simple vote, and under the Act, BLM cannot issue a substantially similar plan without new legislation.

Vote Record

House, 2025-11-18

216 Yea209 Nay0 NV
Republicans
213Y / 1N / 5NV
Democrats
3Y / 208N / 3NV

Passed Congress.gov — House Roll Call #296

House vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-10-30

52 Yea45 Nay0 NV
Republicans
51Y / 0N / 2NV
Democrats
1Y / 43N / 1NV
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #599

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

Senate, 2025-10-29

54 Yea46 Nay0 NV
Republicans
53Y / 0N
Democrats
1Y / 44N
Independents
0Y / 2N

Passed Congress.gov — Senate Roll Call #595

Senate vote by state

AK
ME
WI
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DC
DE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
FL

Hover over a state to see its delegation

Republican majority Yea
Bipartisan split
No vote data

All Sources

Everything on this page ties back to one of these. Click through if you want to check.